:: Free article content
Authors: Maximum article exposure. Publishers: Reprintable article content.
Featured Articles
Recently Added Articles
Most Viewed Articles
Article Comments
Advanced Article Search
Submit Article
Check Article Status
Author TOS
RSS Article Feeds
Terms of Service

Document Spoliation Causes Plaintiff to Lose Case
Home Business Legal
By: Bradley Morton Email Article
Word Count: 471 Digg it | it | Google it | StumbleUpon it


Keeping relevant data and documents is important if you believe that your company may become involved in litigation, even if you are the plaintiff. Doing otherwise may lead to the dismissal of your case.

During the document review process undertaken by eDiscovery firms it's sometimes revealed that some documents that need to be presented in court are missing. Many people tend to assume that the missing documents are on the defendants side, as the party on the receiving end of a civil lawsuit may have an interest in "losing" any documents that may serve to prove that they acted improperly. Courts tend to have a very dim view of defendants who are unable to present the needed data during the discovery process even if it is shown that the unavailability of the documents is not the result of willful and malicious destruction, but rather an error.

However, the plaintiff is also obliged to keep all discoverable documents, whether it is electronic data or paper documents. This is because some of the documents could be useful to the defense. A case that has been reported in legal news recently, the one of 915 Broadway Associates LLC v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP shows that quite clearly.

In this case, a litigation hold letter was issued in April of 2008 and sent to the main custodians of the data, in this case mainly consisting of email messages. Despite the request for a litigation hold, custodians were actively engaged in deleting emails that were relevant to the case. The court also found that the plaintiffs did not make a reasonable effort to put a halt to a process which automatically destroyed email messages. This was not a case where only one person in the organization made a mistake. The court determined that out of the 14 main custodians of the data, 9 had engaged in deleting documents relevant to the case. But it goes even further. Even after the defendants raised the issue that the spoliation of documents might be occurring, the plaintiff still kept deleting data. The defendant even took out an entire server used to store email and discarded it, without making any effort to preserve any of the data needed for the trial.

There are many types of electronic information used in an eDiscovery firm’s Document Review process and email messages are seen as one of the most common ones. According to the court, any party that has a reasonable expectation of being involved in litigation must act to put a litigation hold into place. The party is responsible for identifying any data subject to the hold, preserve it and also ensure that everyone in the organization, no matter what their role is, complies with the legal hold.

This article was written by Bradley Morton, he is a law student interested in the legal discovery process and hoping to one day be an attorney. He believes that technology has the power to revolutionize legal proceedings, through things like electronic discovery Document Review.

Article Source:

This article has been viewed 726 times.

Rate Article
Rating: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).

Article Comments
There are no comments for this article.

Leave A Reply
 Your Name
 Your Email Address [will not be published]
 Your Website [optional]
 What is seven + two? [tell us you're human]
Notify me of followup comments via email

Related Articles

Copyright © 2019 by All rights reserved.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Submit Article | Editorial