If Scarlett Johansson can be a mother to all men, but not to all women, itís fascinating to wonder if thereís something wrong.
A mother to all men is not a natural mother. A non-natural mother is a supernatural mother (which isnít the same as the supernatural, mind), and a supernatural mother is a real equal; so in other words, Scarlett Johansson has the ability to be a real equal to all men, but not to all women. The issue is no less solved, but is also no less fascinating needless to say.
All men are all realities. And so are all women. All realities are no fictions, and no fictions are realities Ė realities is fiction.
Johansson is still a real equal, but now itís about understanding why Johansson can be a real equal to one type of fiction but not to another type of fiction. Will it help if the term "real equal" is dissected: a real equal is the same as a fictional hierarchy, and a fictional hierarchy is the same as an equality Ė an equality can just be the same as a reality.
For Johansson, the meaning of being a reality Ė or just being real Ė is the meaning of only applying to one type of fiction and not another type of fiction. A type of fiction is a non-type of reality Ė a non-type of reality is a fictional type, and a fictional type is a real non-type.
A real non-type is a type Ė Johansson applies to one type, but not another type.
A real that applies to one type, and not another type, is a real that doesnít apply to one uniformity and doesnít apply to another uniformity: a real that doesnít apply to a uniformity and doesnít apply to a uniformity is a fiction that applies to a uniformity and applies to a uniformity Ė a fiction that applies to a uniformity and applies to a uniformity is a non-application of uniformity and an application of uniformity.
A non-application of uniformity and an application of uniformity is a uniform application of hierarchy Ė a uniform application of hierarchy is a different non-application of reality.
A different non-application of reality is a fictional different non-application; a fictional different non-application is a real non-application Ė a real non-application is a fictional application.
And lastly: what is a fictional application?
A fictional application is a fictional tool. A fictional tool is a real non-tool; a real non-tool is a tool thatís fiction.
A tool thatís fiction is a tool thatís magic. A tool thatís magic is a means thatís magic. A means thatís magic is a condescension thatís magic Ė a condescension thatís magic is a fairness thatís real.
A fairness thatís real is a reality thatís unfair Ė a reality thatís unfair is a magic thatís fair.
Finally: a magic thatís fair is a fairness that is real.
Scarlett Johansson is the visual appearance of fairness