ArticleBiz.com :: Free article content
Authors: Maximum article exposure. Publishers: Reprintable article content.
BROWSE ARTICLES
ArticleBiz.com Home
Featured Articles
Recently Added Articles
Most Viewed Articles
Article Comments
Advanced Article Search
AUTHORS
Submit Article
Check Article Status
Author TOS
PUBLISHERS
RSS Article Feeds
Terms of Service

The Battle of Hastings in 1066 was reality's inability to worship Hollywood
Home Social Issues Philosophy
By: Thomas Cullen Email Article
Word Count: 494 Digg it | Del.icio.us it | Google it | StumbleUpon it

  

The opposite, of Hollywood being the means to protect the Battle of Hastings is British history being the means to end Hollywood Ė and British history being a weapon against Hollywood is the past being a weapon against the modern.

A past thatís a weapon, against the modern is a weapon thatís a modern against the modern; a weapon thatís a modern against the modern is a weapon thatís a modern for the past.

A weapon thatís modern, for the past, is a non-weapon thatís the past for the past. A non-weapon is a unification, and thus, a unification thatís the past for the past is separation thatís the modern for the past Ė so whatís a separation thatís the past for the past?

A separation is a lack of power. The past is less than the present, and so the past is also a lack of power. A lack of power thatís the lack of power for the lack of power is a power thatís the lack of power for power Ė a power thatís the lack of power for power is a power thatís against itself for itself.

A power thatís against itself for itself is a lack of power Ė or an origin of reality Ė thatís for itself so that it can one day be against itself; in other words, when reality creates Hollywood in Los Angeles in order to make sure that nothing stops the Battle of Hastings from happening, the actuality is that the history of reality is supporting itself so that it can then betray itself further down the line.

The Battle of Hastings took place in 1066; so in actuality, in 1066 reality was loyal to itself but only on the basis that reality promised itself to create Hollywood later on in history Ė which makes Hollywood and the entire history of Hollywood movies and cinema into a planned betrayal against the Battle of Hastings (and it makes the Battle of Hastings into an accidental support for Hollywood).

To be absolutely clear: the Battle of Hastings, in 1066 was reality trying to worship Hollywood, but obviously failing to do so.

Hollywood is a logical source of worship. Movie stars, screenwriting, press junkets, etc: itís obvious why reality wants to worship Hollywood, but then reality has to be patient Ė the Battle of Hastings perhaps represents this inability to be patient.

In a general context, what Iím trying to get across is that conflict, and war and illness (including natural illness like cancer) can all be forms of when reality tries to worship things, but lacks the actual ability to do so.

The Battle of Hastings, in 1066 was the result of reality trying to worship Hollywood before it had the actual ability to worship Hollywood

Would like all planets in the universe to go to war with the Iraq War, over the right to be a mother or father to Talitha Bateman

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

This article has been viewed 74 times.

Rate Article
Rating: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).

Article Comments
There are no comments for this article.

Leave A Reply
 Your Name
 Your Email Address [will not be published]
 Your Website [optional]
 What is one + two? [tell us you're human]
Notify me of followup comments via email


Related Articles


Copyright © 2018 by ArticleBiz.com. All rights reserved.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Submit Article | Editorial