The example of India is to be followed, because one day we will have Hollywood as our sole cultural reference. Cultural diversity is a must as much as biological is a must in order for life to keep on flourishing.
We, from "Brief and to the Point" blog strongly disprove Mrs. Anupama Chopra’s line on her Hollywood-oriented article for the New York Times where among other naive statements she made on her article where she mocks her own culture when she writes a rotten pearl like: "Ultimately Ms. Bachchan chose to return to Mumbai and starve with a smile." What "Brief and to the Point" blog does not understand is Mrs. Anupama Chopra’s refusal towards her own culture when she chooses to mock on Karva Chauth. One of sociology’s most important lessons on culture is that "Culture is supposed to be accessed" not mocked at. Either you access it within its scope or leave it alone.
Brief and to the Point:
Do "The New York Times" fees include Mrs. Chopra’s cultural hara-kiri?
Page 2 of 2 :: First | Last :: Prev | 1 2 | Next
|