ArticleBiz.com :: Free article content
Authors: Maximum article exposure. Publishers: Reprintable article content.  
BROWSE ARTICLES
ArticleBiz.com Home
Featured Articles
Recently Added Articles
Most Viewed Articles
Article Comments
Advanced Article Search
AUTHORS
Submit Article
Check Article Status
Author TOS
PUBLISHERS
RSS Article Feeds
Terms of Service

Graphology at Home-Lesson 14-How the Alphabet is Evaluated
Home :: Reference & Education :: Writing & Speaking
By: Joel Engel Email Article
Word Count: 988 Digg it | Del.icio.us it | Google it | StumbleUpon it

  

• Each of the foregoing letters has something different in its form and, therefore, in the interpretation to be put upon it. Often the same meaning can be derived from several different letters in one person’s handwriting. This is because the same characteristic form can appear in different letters. The reader should now be able to discern the meaning of any letter simply by knowing which form it should fit into.
• Here are two examples of how it works:

• Consider the letter A. This letter has two factors that we are concerned about. It is a capital, and it is quite thin. The capital letter reflects the ego of the writer, and because he "thins himself out," we say that he is shy. The same interpretation would be true of, say, a capital H: This thin capital also implies that the writer is shy.

• Picture the lowercase a, the bottom is open and the letter is oval-shaped. Therefore, the rule that applies here applies to any oval-shaped letter with an open bottom--perhaps the letter o.

• The letters a and o are both middle-zone letters, but upper zone and lower zone letters also belong to this category, providing that they have round parts in the middle zone; for example, the letter d.

• Once you understand the principles, it should be easy to interpret all the possible variations in letter shapes.

• What the graphologist is really seeking in analyzing handwriting are the writer’s personality traits. A personality trait is usually composed of many different factors. For example, if the writing indicated a lack of self-control, passion, impulsiveness, and violence, the graphologist would sum up the personality trait as temper. Should self-control, passion, and violence be present, without impulsiveness, temper would still be indicated, but if violence were the missing element, the graphologist would hesitate to say flat out that the writer has a bad temper. He might admit, however, that the possibility of temper exists.
• A similar situation exists in interpreting letters. Before the graphologist weighs the form of a letter into a total analysis, he looks for consistency. In other words, he must find the same form often enough in the writing to be significant before he includes its meaning in the total analysis. Here is the usual rule of thumb: If all the major components are present, we say that the personality trait most definitely exists. If all the major components but one are found, there is a strong possibility that the personality trait exists. If only one major component is found, the writer has a tendency toward this trait.

• Small minimum letters (i.e., middle zone letters) show the concentrating, frugal, and masculine worker. Small and carefully executed minimum letters have been seen in the handwriting of first-rate research workers, teachers, scientists, and thinkers, who keep themselves under the strictest self-control so as to be able to accomplish what they undertake (Nietzsche, Einstein). However, it should be noted that inferiority feelings and temporary depressions also express themselves in small minimum letters.
• A letter may not only be tall or small or deep, but also wide or narrow; it may widen itself in a left tending or right tending direction, or shrink from these directions; it also may widen itself to a reasonable extent or at the expense of its neighbors.
• To judge, for example, the width of a letter in an individual handwriting, we must know the penmanship models on which this handwriting is based. In Palmer's models such letters as e, i, o, a, and s are supposed to be taller than they are wide, the m, n, and w wider than they are tall. Only deviations from these norms can be considered "wide" or "too wide," "narrow" or "too narrow."

Page 1 of 2 :: First | Last :: Prev | 1 2 | Next

Joel Engel is the author of Handwriting Analysis Self-Taught (Penguin Books). For more information, please click http://careertest.wswww.learngraphology.com

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

This article has been viewed 72 times.

Rate Article
Rating: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).

Article Comments
There are no comments for this article.

Leave A Reply
 Your Name
 Your Email Address [will not be published]
 Your Website [optional]
 What is three + five? [tell us you're human]
Notify me of followup comments via email


Related Articles


Copyright © 2008 by ArticleBiz.com. All rights reserved.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Submit Article | Editorial