Everyone at some stage in their life questions why they exist and the meaning of all that is. We come up with various theories in our continuous search for truth to find a perfect model that stands the test of time. The creational theories we hold on to tend to rely heavily on individual belief structures and value systems. Any amount of difference in approach can lead to undecided reasoning. Creation and belief are thus two different things. One approach is what we want to believe and the other what is factually understood through our physical perception. What then creates a perfect model for creation if facts cannot be accurately determined so readily and when belief is choice based?
In order to create a perfect model of creation one would first have to look at what position they find themselves in. That means what framework to start from. Which obviously in our current position that is from our human physical body and mind. We know certain facts about our world already that seem very solid in our mind. We know that we have a physical body that we utilize certain physical senses in order to interact with the world around us. We also know that this physical body does not stay the same and eventually will die and regenerate back into the earth. One other very important thing that we know is that there is another component of ourselves that is not linked to the human body as such but has a world totally of its own.
This place I refer to is the mind, a place where we reason all that we do daily, where we determine ourselves as physically existing. What is this place the mind? The mind is something that we cannot fully put our fingers on, or determine in any physical sense. It is not the brain, or any other physical component but a separate living reality that formulates reasoning in the world around us.
If creation were to be reasoned in any way it would have to hold true to these two readily available confirmations that we continually face daily, physicality and the mind, hold the framework of our existence. These two factors, the mind and the physical, are here and as much as we might at times imagine them to not exist they still remain.
When looking at already evaluated theories of creation it is obvious to see the links between these two major factors of the mind and the physical. Most of the common theories base creation on a line that links mostly with the creative mind, ordering creation in a basis of story and a father or mother. Or some higher being that created all. This concept comes purely from the mind approach at viewing creation and formulates itself based very much on choice of belief and how we wish to utilize this within our ordered daily lives. The other sort of theory is based purely on the physical, concentrating on how form is developed and produced, but avoids often the understanding of what comes from deep within all, our consciousness and our mind.
These two theory models are always in conflict with each other. One wants to be emotional, creative and have more reason for its basis than just to say we are a physical body. The other sees life more practical and thinks that theories that over exaggerate the creative can lead away from factual physically proven evidence. Which of these theories is right or wrong?
Page 1 of 3 :: First | Last :: Prev | 1 2 3 | Next