It would be nearly impossible to get an ISL project permitted in the United States using these chemicals to leach the uranium. The water quality division, within a state’s Department of Environmental Quality (DQE), demands restoration to background, which is about where the groundwater was before ISL mining began. “The less things you add, the less you have to reclaim at the end of the process,” Doug Norris pointed out. “The more stuff you add trying to get it out of the ground, the more you have to clean up.”

Dennis Stover explained how the fluids presently used came about, “Historically, most ISL operations had a great deal of difficulty with plugging or fouling of their injection wells due to the precipitation of excessive amounts of salts.” He pointed out that the chemistry miners were using in conventional milling operations didn’t work in ISL mining. “Because they had very high concentrated salt solutions, they were trying to accelerate everything,” Stover told us. “When you take those concentrated solutions and put them underground, Mother Nature is not always happy. Other salts that were present in the rock would dissolve, solutions would become supersaturated and they would precipitate out. The wells would plug up.”

Some of the early U.S. operations tried to enhance their production, for example, by using ammonia to enhance the pH of their water. “They forgot that ammonia is easily locked up by clay and almost impossible to get back to background,” explained Norris. “It’s pretty reactive and doesn’t occur that much in nature.” Norris would give anyone using ammonia during the mining procedure, “a 95 percent chance of having a very bad time.” Why, we asked? Norris responded, “It’s bad from the fact that nobody has been able to successfully clean up a site that has used ammonia.”

Norris explained that sometimes you have to add a carbonate source, such as carbon dioxide “to stabilize the dissolved uranium as uranyl dicarbonate.” Norris said, “The uranium is in a solid state in the ore, as Mother Nature left it. We oxidize it and turn it into uranyl dicarbonate.” What goes to the processing plant is called lixiviate, the dissolved uranium in its ionic form. According to Anthony, “Today, most ISL mining operates at neutral pH, and the uranium is complexed as a dicarbonate.”

Water is circulated through the injection wells with the expressed purpose of separating the uranium coating the sandstone. Each time you circulate the water through the orebody, you are capturing some of the uranium. Each pass through is called a pore volume. “It’s like filling up a bucket of sand with water,” explained Anthony. “Once you have the bucket full of sand, you can still pour in water. The amount of water you can pour in until you just bring it up to the top of the sand is termed a ‘pore volume.’ Pore volume is the interspatial volume.”

In Anthony’s models for operating an economic ISL plant, he calculates 20 pore volumes (PV). Porosity, or the spaces in between the sand particles, where the water can travel (permeability), helps determine how much uranium can be recovered. “It takes about 20 PV to 30PV to recover the highest percentage,” said David Miller, who was Cogema’s chief ISL geologist in the United States, before becoming President of Strathmore Minerals. “But, as the price of uranium keeps going higher, it may be economic to recover a higher percentage of the orebody. Maybe 40PV to 50PV will be possible with the direction the prices are moving. Of course, your average processed grade will go down. A few years ago, you would want to shut wells off at 15 parts per million (ppm), but now you might want to run them at 10ppm. At $50/pound uranium, you may be able to run at 7 or 8ppm.”

Page 3 of 4 :: First | Last :: Prev | 1 2 3 4 | Next