So, third conclusion: If the base of humanoid is located at the bounds of solar system, then they  and their robots must at a given time be located on earth gathering information about human beings. But there is always mistakes, also always unforeseen and undefeated phenomenon in nature. That means, with humanoid there should be catastrophe, ruin and accident. Let their techniques so developed that ordinary earthly method could not detect it on earth, but the possibility of accident sooner or later should get to us,  the presence of humanoid on our planet is indisputable to people. They understand not better than we do, therefore, observing the mask would not be long.

So, fourth conclusion: In the process of their location on Earth, humanoid should have at least once sustain catastrophe which would give us indisputable proof of their visit on earth.

Such type of proof should treat: techniques and devices of humanoid, themselves but not photograph and video film, all possible eye witness! In as much that there is no INDISPUTABLE proof, it means that there wasn’t comers on our planet.

The expression “probably” used, because I could not  100% possibility confirmed and the same time with 90 – 99% I could confirm it.
Humanoid never visited the Earth, and the major proof is their absent on Earth.

 2. Is there UFO?

 Unknown Flying Object is the opinion of a particular group of people. Interplanet (or interstar) vessels of humanoid. Today, there is accumulated mass of evidences about the flight of UFO, in vision and photographs. There are radars evidence and eye witnesses, but no one real indisputable accepted fact about the existence of UFO, the body of humanoid, their cosmic vessels are not available. Also no robot and devices having clear unearthly origin. Therefore, the existence of UFO is an open question.

UFO belongs to the class of objects as Loch Ness monster, snow man, bigfoot and other different  phenomenon which there's no real fact about their existence. Anybody could raise an objection: "Is photo and video films not an evidence?" It's possible in the court but not in science!

The description of new species of animal needs at least one sample of such animals: If it's large animal, then there must be as minimum its skin and skull. So, also with UFO and other bigfoot, for scientific research there must be part of these objects which presently none.

So, first conclusion: No indisputable fact of the existence of UFO.

But UFO can exist in reality, the proof of their existence not yet discovered. Also there is no fact of the absence of UFO in real life!. Off course, if there is no exhibition of general review of flying object, it doesn't mean that in nature it doesn't exist. But from other side (here I start partly referring to my former article about humanoid) there's always mistakes and undefeated process in nature. It means that, there must be catastrophe, ruin and accident i.e. in relation to UFO. UFO should have broken down, burnt and fell. As a result we people would have received indisputable evidence about the existence of unearthly intellect

So, second conclusion (which coincide with the fourth conclusion from my former article about humanoid): In the process of their presence on earth, humanoid should have at least once sustain catastrophe which would give us an indisputable proof of their visit on Earth. And so, as there is no INDISPUTABLE fact, it means that also no UFO on our planet My expression "probably" used is because I can't with 100% possibility confirm, at the same time with 90-99% assurance confirm that: there isn't and wasn't UFO on Earth!

These two conclusions from the two articles beautifully supplement each other:

1.  Humanoid never visited the Earth.
2.  There is no UFO and wasn't UFO on Earth.  

Page 2 of 2 :: First | Last :: Prev | 1 2 | Next